Five former chairs of a committee advising the federal government on endangered wildlife have penned an open letter expressing worries about proposed amendments to the Species At Risk Act. They believe these changes could result in the deliberate extinction of endangered species in Canada. The legislation currently safeguards over 600 species, but the potential alterations could undermine its effectiveness, according to the scientists.
The experts, who previously chaired the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC), sent the letter to the government recently. COSEWIC is an independent panel that evaluates species at risk of extinction and recommends their inclusion under endangered species legislation. By making the letter public, the scientists aim to prevent Canadians from unknowingly contributing to the intentional extinction of Canadian wildlife species.
The letter coincides with the Carney government’s review of environmental regulations, including the Species At Risk Act, which could expedite the approval and development of major projects. Notably, proposed changes may eliminate the requirement for a “jeopardy test” for certain projects considered in the national interest, alarming biologist and former COSEWIC chair David Green.
The jeopardy test is a crucial safeguard preventing projects that could harm listed species and their habitats from moving forward if they imperil their survival. Green emphasizes the significance of jeopardy tests as a final defense for vulnerable species in need of protection.
The suggested modifications would grant Carney and the cabinet authority to establish “federal economic zones” for pre-approving industrial developments. Additionally, they could green-light pipelines before finalizing routes and exempt them from federal impact assessments. Bill C-5 already streamlines the approval process for projects deemed nationally important.
The scientists highlighted concerns about a proposed West Coast oil pipeline, which could have devastating effects on various species protected under the act, including the southern resident killer whale and the Chinook salmon. These species and their critical habitats are located in the Salish Sea, the pipeline’s intended terminus.
The potential impact on the imperiled killer whale population through increased tanker traffic noise and habitat destruction raises ethical questions about prioritizing economic interests over environmental conservation. Kathryn Harrison, a UBC professor specializing in climate and energy politics, views the government’s actions as setting an extraordinary precedent through Bill C-5 and related changes.
Despite the scientists’ public plea, the government’s response remains pending. The Privy Council Office asserts its commitment to species conservation and compliance with the Species at Risk Act. The proposed modifications are defended as necessary to bolster the economy and reduce reliance on U.S. trade amid ongoing trade tensions.
No official decision has been announced regarding the amendments, and a report summarizing public feedback is expected before summer’s end. The government extended the public consultation period following opposition from Indigenous groups and environmental organizations. Legislative action is anticipated after Parliament reconvenes in September, although Green urges reconsideration to prevent irreversible species loss.