Defiant against calls for his resignation in the wake of the Peter Mandelson controversy, Keir Starmer hit back at critics, including Tory leader Kemi Badenoch and Green MP Dr Ellie Chowns. Starmer emphasized his commitment to serving the country despite the mounting pressure on the Prime Minister following the dismissal of Foreign Office chief Sir Olly Robbins over Mandelson’s vetting revelations.
During a heated exchange at PMQs, Badenoch demanded that the PM take responsibility and step down. Starmer countered by highlighting Badenoch’s inaccuracies regarding the UK Security Vetting’s recommendation against clearing Mandelson before his assignment to Washington.
Disputing Badenoch’s claims, Starmer emphasized his dedication to delivering for the nation, emphasizing that nothing would divert his focus. Questions arose regarding Starmer’s previous assertion in the Commons that due process was adhered to in Mandelson’s appointment. It later emerged that Starmer was unaware of UKSV’s recommendation, leading to a contentious session where Sir Olly defended his decision not to disclose the information.
Accusations of misleading the House were brought forth by the Tory leader, insinuating that the PM mishandled the situation. Sir Olly, speaking to the Foreign Affairs Committee, criticized No10’s handling of Mandelson’s vetting process. Dr. Chowns condemned the PM for appointing Mandelson despite knowledge of his controversial associations and criticized the dismissive approach to vetting, alleging a compromise in national security.
In response, Starmer clarified the vetting process, acknowledging the oversight of not being informed of the UKSV recommendation. He admitted to the serious error and stated that had he been aware, the appointment would not have proceeded.
Despite the intense scrutiny, Starmer remained resolute in his commitment to his duties.