Andy Burnham has expressed regret over the initial response of the Labour Party to the Gaza conflict and indicated a significant change in the party’s position on the Middle East. The Prime Minister-to-be acknowledged the suffering in Gaza as a “stain on our collective conscience” and emphasized the need to increase pressure on the Israeli government. He denounced the attacks by Hamas on October 7 and the subsequent surge in antisemitism in the UK, including the appalling assaults on synagogues in Manchester.
However, Burnham clarified that there was no inconsistency between a firm stance against antisemitism and holding the Israeli government accountable. In a social media video, he admitted that the party’s reaction to Israel’s military actions in Gaza at the beginning was inadequate and expressed remorse for it. He stressed the necessity for improved responses in the future.
Referring to Keir Starmer’s response to the October 7 attacks, Burnham highlighted the need for clarity and sensitivity in dealing with such sensitive matters. He commended certain actions taken by the government, such as recognizing Palestine, imposing sanctions on Israeli officials and settlers, and restricting arms licenses that could be used in Gaza.
Burnham criticized the UK for being slow to call for a ceasefire and urged for a stronger approach towards the ongoing conflict in Gaza. He condemned Israel’s actions, labeling them as obstacles to a two-state solution. Burnham called for potential sanctions on those responsible for violence in Gaza and a potential ban on trade with illegal settlements.
Expressing dismay over the destruction in Gaza and the alleged war crimes committed, Burnham emphasized the need for accountability and suggested that the international courts should be involved in addressing the situation. He also advocated for closer ties with Europe to enhance defense cooperation and address common challenges like illegal migration and security threats.
Burnham’s statements reflect a growing shift in Labour’s foreign policy stance, emphasizing the importance of addressing conflicts in a more nuanced and proactive manner.