King Charles has made a significant decision not to reside at Buckingham Palace after a costly refurbishment, a choice that has raised concerns about the potential loss of its charm, according to a royal expert. Despite the extensive renovations funded by taxpayers, Charles has opted to maintain Clarence House in London as his official residence alongside Queen Camilla. The monarch will retain properties in Scotland, Gloucestershire, and Norfolk, in addition to utilizing Windsor Castle in Berkshire.
This decision marks the end of a nearly two-century tradition of the monarch residing at Buckingham Palace since Queen Victoria’s tenure began in 1837. Royal commentator Jennie Bond expressed apprehension that the palace’s appeal might diminish, given the influx of tourists and visitors who come to admire the iconic structure.
The ongoing £369 million refurbishment project at Buckingham Palace, which includes essential upgrades to mitigate fire and flood risks, is expected to conclude next March. Charles, who has resided at Clarence House since 2003, will continue to host various events at the palace, such as garden parties, receptions, and diplomatic audiences.
Jennie remarked on the palace’s grandeur, suggesting it might evolve into a beloved museum while serving as a hub for the King’s administrative operations. The decision to forego living at Buckingham Palace aims to enhance public accessibility to the historic landmark, as security concerns would restrict public access if the King were in residence.